Here we are again, Joe Gerstandt and I, exchanging questions and answers.
Joe: We both focus largely on the intangible assets in an organization or community…the things that cannot be easily counted or weighed…things like difference, trust, relationships, culture, etc. What can we do so that more business leaders come to value these incredibly powerful (but often overlooked) assets as highly as they value the tangible kind?
Mary: There are so many studies out there that clearly demonstrate the bottom-line value of difference, relationship, employee engagement, etc. I used to think it was as simple as speaking to the toughest customers in their own language, i.e. if they just saw the evidence, that would be enough. But it doesn’t happen that way. For the biggest critics, there will never be enough evidence. Over time I’ve found that it’s very important to assess where the resistance is coming from before expending a lot of energy. Off the top of my head, here are 4 sources of resistance I commonly see in leaders:
A - Sincerely don’t see the connection of trust, etc. to the goals/purpose of organization or community
B - See the connection, but don’t know how to make it happen
C - See the connection, but are afraid of the personal/professional fallout of supporting
D - Carrying baggage that will never allow them to advocate this approach
I am reminded of Rick Maurer’s work suggesting that there are 3 levels of resistance to change. My VERY abbreviated take is:
Level 1 – I don’t understand it (the proposed change) – info would resolve it
Level 2 – I don’t like it (the proposed change) – it evokes an emotional response
Level 3 – I don’t like you (the presenter, or what you represent) – my experience is that in this case the resistance is not necessarily unreasonable, but it is hard to reason with
(Explanation of Levels in Rick’s own words here.)
If I go back to the sources of resistance I’ve typically observed and match them up to Rick’s categories, I have this:
A – simply don’t see the connection - more info may be enough (level 1)
B - don’t know how to make it happen – may need more info, but the resistance may also be charged with an emotional reaction, such as fear of looking stupid (level 1 or 2)
C – afraid of fallout – may be charged with fear of looking incompetent or may be even more charged because of past negative experience when took a risk (level 2 or 3)
D – I’ll never agree, no matter what – could be heavy baggage about what it means to be an employee, e.g. “do what you’re told,” “check personal issues at the door,” “work is not personal, it’s business”
You could probably come up with several other permutations, but my point is this: don’t take the resistance at face value. Rick says some have a tendency to treat all resistance as if it is a Level 1 issue. But Humans are complex and our reasons are sometimes deep and unconscious. My intent is to do a reasonable assessment. Determine what I can do about the resistance and whether I have the skill and energy to put into it. When I find I am spinning my wheels it’s often because I have underestimated the level of resistance. And, amazingly enough, at levels 2 and 3, I have found that compassionate questioning and listening go a long way.
NOTE: Find articles on Levels of Resistance and dealing with each in Rick’s online library.
Would you like to get goodies or smart articles like this in future? If so, simply subscribe via email or RSS.
Copyright 2009, Artemis Path, Inc. All rights reserved. No content on this site may be reused in any fashion without written permission from Artemis Path, Inc.


{ 3 comments… read them below or add one }
I am struck by D (I’ll never agree no matter what) in your list. When I was first formulating the three levels, my buddy Massimo suggested that there might be a Level 4. And I’m still not sure how to answer that question. Whenever I get cynical – like this morning as I look over the week’s news about the conflation of race, leadership, lack of civility, and health care – I think Level 4 (or your D) must be true. And then I remember South Africa’s move from apartheid, or the Common Ground Network for Life and Choice and their groundbreaking work getting prolife and prochoice advocates to look for (and find) common ground on the abortion question.
Thank you for a thoughtful piece. Got me thinking, and on a Saturday morning no less!
Rick, thank you so much for taking the time to respond. And your comments made me rethink how I might want to think about those clients that would fall into a “Level 4.” In reading your comment I wondered why I believe both points at the same time, i.e. I believe there is no hope for some people changing, and yet I also believe that humans are capable of dramatic transformation.
I think I fall into “they won’t change” based on my belief in my own skill-level, capacity for compassion, and energy and interest level at any particular point in time. Isn’t that really what it comes down to? I’m sort of falling into my own category B from my post – I believe the transformation IS possible, but I too don’t know how to “make it happen,” that is, how to influence them. I think I will be more careful in the language I use in assessing these situations. This probably deserves a follow-up post…
My smart, kind friend Suzanna is talking about the Q&A Joe and I are doing. Cool. http://www.examiner.com/examiner/x-365-SF-Boomers-Examiner~y2009m10d7-Leaderships-role-redefined-by-new-media